AI Companies Are Buying Rare Books, Scanning Them for Training Data, Then Shredding Them
Multiple AI companies are buying rare books, scanning them for training data, then shredding the originals — including irreplaceable texts.
The New York Times published a FAQ this week working through the unsettled legal questions around AI music generation — including whether using a generative tool to remix a famous artist like Madonna crosses a legal line. The piece arrives as the music industry's confrontation with AI platforms moves into the courts.
AI music services Suno and Udio are facing lawsuits from major labels, and the legal framework governing what creators can and cannot do with these tools remains genuinely unresolved. The technology exists and works; the rules that govern it are still being written by judges and legislators.
The FAQ format signals something about where this issue sits culturally — not at the expert-consensus stage, but at the stage where everyday readers are confused about the basics and turning to trusted outlets for orientation. That's a different milestone than a court ruling, but not an insignificant one.
All comments are reviewed before appearing. Keep it respectful.
Multiple AI companies are buying rare books, scanning them for training data, then shredding the originals — including irreplaceable texts.
Adam Mosseri says Instagram no longer requires engineers to code 40–60% of the time and has scrapped the traditional technical interview loop.
Sam Altman says AI won't shorten the workweek because humans enjoy staying busy and will just create more work to fill the time.