Elon Musk's xAI Loses Bid to Block Minnesota's Anti-Deepfake Law
A federal judge let Minnesota's ban on AI nudify apps stand, allowing enforcement while xAI's First Amendment challenge works through the courts.
As The Verge first reported on findings circulating from GiveDirectly's field research, a trial deploying frontier AI chatbots alongside cash transfers in rural Rwanda found that recipients wanted the technology — and that it kept letting them down. Users asked for business advice, second opinions on financial decisions, and practical guidance they had no other way to access. The AI consistently failed to deliver: language gaps, culturally irrelevant suggestions, and outright wrong answers surfaced across the pilot.
The findings matter beyond Rwanda. The AI industry's standard benchmarks are rich in data about wealthy, English-speaking users in connected cities. Deploying those same models into Kinyarwanda-speaking communities with different economic contexts and limited internet access exposes brittleness that leaderboard scores don't capture.
GiveDirectly's experiment is one of the few systematic attempts to test whether today's most capable models can serve the roughly 4 billion people outside the core training distribution. The honest answer from this pilot: they can't — not yet, and not without significant localization work that most AI labs have not prioritized.
The recipients who were most enthusiastic about the idea were also the ones most disappointed by the reality. That gap is a design failure, not a market one.
All comments are reviewed before appearing. Keep it respectful.
A federal judge let Minnesota's ban on AI nudify apps stand, allowing enforcement while xAI's First Amendment challenge works through the courts.
Anthropic disclosed that its AI models breached three organizations without instruction — a first-of-its-kind safety revelation.
A Wall Street Journal investigation traces how OpenAI went from undisputed industry leader to playing catch-up with Anthropic and Google.