A.I. Learns to Write in DNA
Scientists prompted A.I. to design and create new viruses for the first time, a milestone for medicine that also raises new biosecurity concerns.
A benchmark study from Artificial Analysis, surfaced via Reddit's r/artificial community, has put a precise number on the AI cost divide: China's DeepSeek V4-Flash averages just 3 cents per test. Fellow Chinese model Kimi K3 comes in at 86 cents per test — and the study indicates U.S. models price even higher still.
The Artificial Analysis benchmarks measure affordability, not raw performance. That distinction matters for businesses deploying models across high-volume use cases, where per-query costs compound quickly. A model that costs a fraction of a cent per call in bulk is a fundamentally different commercial proposition than one that costs a dollar.
The gap, as measured here, is not marginal — it is an order of magnitude. For U.S. AI labs competing for global enterprise contracts, the benchmarks raise commercial questions that performance rankings alone don't answer. Whether DeepSeek's pricing advantage reflects engineering efficiency, cost structures, or other factors, the number in the study is what enterprise buyers see first.
All comments are reviewed before appearing. Keep it respectful.
Scientists prompted A.I. to design and create new viruses for the first time, a milestone for medicine that also raises new biosecurity concerns.
The Trump administration has no idea on how to handle open-source and open-weight AI models from China.
Google is consolidating AI leadership in California but the reorganization is pushing out the engineers who built its AI division