ArXiv Bans Accounts Flooding the Platform With AI-Generated Research Papers

Per a discussion gaining traction on Reddit's r/MachineLearning community, arXiv is now actively banning accounts that upload low-quality, AI-generated preprints — and the broader debate is turning to whether the platform's decades-old endorsement system can be restructured to hold the line.

The specific question researchers are debating: should arXiv revoke endorsement privileges from established academics whose sponsored newcomers are submitting machine-generated work? The endorsement model was designed to vouch for submitters' credibility before they could upload papers. It was not designed for a world where producing a convincing-looking research paper takes twenty minutes and a free API key.

arXiv processes roughly 20,000 new preprints per month. Even a modest contamination rate threatens to overwhelm the volunteer moderation layer and erode the platform's standing as the definitive pre-publication record across physics, mathematics, and computer science. Account bans address bad actors; the endorsement reform debate is about closing the structural door.

The harder problem is not identifying the obvious offenders — it is that well-meaning researchers using AI assistance for drafting sit somewhere on a continuum that does not have a clean line. Academic publishing has not drawn that line yet.

Read the full story at Reddit r/MachineLearning