Joby's Electric Air Taxi Flew Over Manhattan. Passengers Are Years Away.
Joby pulled off a splashy Manhattan demo, but FAA certification and the hard economics of eVTOL still stand between the company and fare-paying riders.
According to an article published by Ars Technica, US federal intelligence agencies and domestic law enforcement—including the FBI and DHS—are heavily shifting surveillance efforts toward a broad new threat category labeled "anti-tech violent extremism." Spurred by recent high-profile attacks on tech CEOs, widespread protests against data center construction, and growing public anxiety over AI job replacement, authorities have compiled over 1,000 pages of internal reports to monitor these groups. This surveillance surge is heavily tied to the Trump administration's broad directives targeting anti-capitalist or "anti-American" ideologies, drawing sharp criticism from legal experts who warn that the vague criteria could easily criminalize peaceful, constitutionally protected protests by local communities and tech skeptics. Civil liberties advocates fear that by framing data center opposition and nonviolent tech critiques as precursors to domestic terrorism, the government is essentially weaponizing the domestic surveillance apparatus to protect tech infrastructure and silence dissent against rapid AI proliferation.
Joby pulled off a splashy Manhattan demo, but FAA certification and the hard economics of eVTOL still stand between the company and fare-paying riders.
As AI agents move money, send emails, and approve workflows, vendors, deployers, and users are all pointing at each other on liability.
A viral post argues the biggest productivity wins come from stable workflows around any good-enough model — not from upgrading every time benchmarks shift.